Project 265: N. B. Simmons, J. H.Geisler. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx to extant bat lineages, with comments on the evolution of echolocation and foraging strategies in Microchiroptera. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 235:1-182.
Specimen: Icaronycteris


The Eocene fossil record of bats (Chiroptera) includes four genera known from relatively complete skeletons: Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx. Phylogenetic relationships of these taxa to each other and to extant lineages of bats were investigated in a parsimony analysis of 195 morphological characters, 12 rDNA restriction site characters, and one character based on the number of R-1 tandem repeats in the mtDNA d-loop region. Results indicate that Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx represent a series of consecutive sister-taxa to extant microchiropteran bats. This conclusion stands in contrast to previous suggestions that these fossil forms represent either a primitive grade ancestral to both Megachiroptera and Microchiroptera (e.g., Eochiroptera) or a separate clade within Microchiroptera (e.g., Palaeochiropterygoidea). A new higher-level classification is proposed to better reflect hypothesized relationships among Eocene fossil bats and extant taxa. Critical features of this classification include restriction of Microchiroptera to the smallest clade that includes all extant bats that use sophisticated echolocation (Emballonuridae + Yinochiroptera + Yangochiroptera), and formal recognition of two more inclusive clades that encompass Microchiroptera plus the four fossil genera. Comparisons of results of separate phylogenetic analyses including and subsequently excluding the fossil taxa indicate that inclusion of the fossils changes the results in two ways: (1) altering perceived relationships among extant forms at a few poorly supported nodes; and (2) reducing perceived support for some nodes near the base of the tree. Inclusion of the fossils affects some character polarities (hence slightly changing tree topology), and also changes the levels at which transformations appear to apply (hence altering perceived support for some clades). Results of an additional phylogenetic analysis in which soft-tissue and molecular characters were excluded from consideration indicate that these characters are critical for determination of relationships among extant lineages. Our phylogeny provides a basis for evaluating previous hypotheses on the evolution of flight, echolocation, and foraging strategies. We propose that flight evolved before echolocation, and that the first bats used vision for orientation in their arboreal/aerial environment. The evolution of flight was followed by the origin of low-duty-cycle laryngeal echolocation in early members of the microchiropteran lineage. This system was most likely simple at first, permitting orientation and obstacle detection but not detection or tracking of airborne prey. Owing to the mechanical coupling of ventilation and flight, the energy costs of echolocation to flying bats were relatively low. In contrast, the benefits of aerial insectivory were substantial, and a more sophisticated low-duty-cycle echolocation system capable of detecting, tracking, and assessing airborne prey subsequently evolved rapidly. The need for an increasingly derived auditory system, together with limits on body size imposed by the mechanics of flight, echolocation, and prey capture, may have resulted in reduction and simplification of the visual system as echolocation became increasingly important. Our analysis confirms previous suggestions that Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx used echolocation. Foraging strategies of these forms were reconstructed based on postcranial osteology and wing form, cochlear size, and stomach contents. In the context of our phylogeny, we suggest that foraging behavior in the microchiropteran lineage evolved in a series of steps: (1) gleaning food objects during short flights from a perch using vision for orientation and obstacle detection; prey detection by passive means, including vision and/or listening for prey-generated sounds (no known examples in fossil record); (2) gleaning stationary prey from a perch using echolocation and vision for orientation and obstacle detection; prey detection by passive means (Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris); (3) perch hunting for both stationary and flying prey using echolocation and vision for orientation and obstacle detection; prey detection and tracking using echolocation for flying prey and passive means for stationary prey (no known example, although Icaronycteris and/or Archaeonycteris may have done this at times); (4) combined perch hunting and continuous aerial hawking using echolocation and vision for orientation and obstacle detection; prey detection and tracking using echolocation for flying prey and passive means for stationary prey; calcar-supported uropatagium used for prey capture (common ancestor of Hassianycteris and Palaeochiropteryx; retained in Palaeochiropteryx); (5) exclusive reliance on continuous aerial hawking using echolocation and vision for orientation and obstacle detection; prey detection and tracking using echolocation (Hassianycteris; common ancestor of Microchiroptera). The transition to using echolocation to detect and track prey would have been difficult in cluttered environments owing to interference produced by multiple returning echoes. We therefore propose that this transition occurred in bats that foraged in forest gaps and along the edges of lakes and rivers in situations where potential perch sites were adjacent to relatively clutter-free open spaces. Aerial hawking using echolocation to detect, track, and evaluate prey was apparently the primitive foraging strategy for Microchiroptera. This implies that gleaning, passive prey detection, and perch hunting among extant microchiropterans are secondarily derived specializations rather than retentions of primitive habits. Each of these habits has apparently evolved multiple times. The evolution of continuous aerial hawking may have been the 'key innovation' responsible for the burst of diversification in microchiropteran bats that occurred during the Eocene. Fossils referable to six major extant lineages are known from middle-late Eocene deposits, and reconstruction of ghost lineages leads to the conclusion that at least seven more extant lineages were minimally present by the end of the Eocene.

Read the article »

Project DOI: 10.7934/P265,
This project containsMatrices
  • 1 Media
  • 1 Matrix
  • 31 Taxa
  • 2 Specimens
  • 208 Characters
Total size of project's media files: 8.24M

Download Project SDD File
Total scored cells: 5050
Total media associated with cells: 0
Total labels associated with cell media: 0
Total characters: 208
Total characters with associated media: 0
Total characters with media with labels: 0
Total character states: 488
Total character states with associated media: 0
Total character states with media with labels:0
Total unordered/ordered characters:208/0
Currently Viewing:
MorphoBank Project 265

    Authors' Institutions

    • American Museum of Natural History


    member name taxa specimens media media
    chars character
    notes  media
    cell scorings
    (scored, NPA, "-")
    notes  medialabels
    Nancy Simmons
    Project Administrator
    (4904, 0, 146)

    Taxonomic Overview for Matrix 'M676' (30 Taxa)

    taxon unscored
    no cell
    "-" cellscell images labels on
    cell images
    [1] Scandentia
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [2] Dermoptera
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [3] Pteropodidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [4] Icaronycteris
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [5] Archaeonycteris
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [6] Palaeochiropteryx
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [7] Hassianycteris
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [8] Emballonuridae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [9] Rhinopomatidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [10] Craseonycteridae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [11] Nycteridae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [12] Megadermatidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [13] Rhinolophinae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [14] Hipposiderinae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [15] Phyllostomidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [16] Mormoopidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [17] Noctilionidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [18] Mystacinidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [19] Myzopodidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [20] Thyropteridae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [21] Furipteridae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [22] Natalidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [23] Antrozoidae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [24] Tomopeatinae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [25] Molossinae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [26] Vespertilioninae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [27] Minopterinae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [28] Myotinae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [29] Murininae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13
    [30] Kerivoulinae
    Last Modified in 12/05/13

    Project views

    type number of views Individual items viewed (where applicable)
    Total project views36560
    Project overview4428
    Media views6116Media search (5166 views); M26813 (950 views);
    Matrix views2558Matrix landing page (2151 views); Simmons and Geisler matrix (407 views);
    Taxon list19134
    Specimen list4318
    Documents list6

    Project downloads

    type number of downloads Individual items downloaded (where applicable)
    Total downloads from project387
    Media downloads1M26813 (1 download);
    Project downloads374
    Matrix downloads12Simmons and Geisler matrix (12 downloads);